Thursday, 22 November 2012

Stop Acting Rich

Stop Acting Rich

The authors define an  as having a net worth equal to one-tenth their age multiplied by their current annual income from all sources. E.g., a 50-year-old person who over the past twelve months earned employment income of $45,000 and investment income of $5,000 should have an expected net worth of $250,000. An "Under Accumulator of Wealth (UAW)" would have half that amount, and a "Prodigious Accumulator of Wealth (PAW)" would have two times. This metric has been criticized since, for example, a 20-year-old making $50k a year should have a net worth of $100k to be considered an "average accumulator of wealth". That makes little sense since it would take a new graduate years of strong savings and investments to accumulate that amount. The formula fails to take into account compounding interest; younger people up to age 45 or so will generally have much less as a % of income than older wealth accumulators due to compounded growth.Most of the millionaire households that they profiled did not have the extravagant lifestyles that most people would assume. 

Stop Acting Rich

Stop Acting Rich

Stop Acting Rich

Stop Acting Rich

Stop Acting Rich

Stop Acting Rich

Stop Acting Rich

Stop Acting Rich

Stop Acting Rich

No comments:

Post a Comment